Organizations often have playbooks that spell out how to structure contracts with customers, vendors and other business entities. These playbooks outline necessary contract clauses that must be included and any parameters that need to be kept to, helping ensure that there is consistency across agreements.
Rather than constantly pinging the compliance department for advice on how best to structure a new client agreement, internal stakeholders can instead pose the question to generative AI using straightforward natural language. They can even paste sections of the contract into the generative AI interface and ask it, “Have I missed anything important in this particular section?”
Elsewhere within the organization, picture the IT team rolling out a brand-new document management system or practice management system. From there, the IT team could let a generative AI-powered chatbot provide product support and answer common questions that new lawyers might have about using the system, giving the IT team more bandwidth to focus on trickier questions or edge scenarios.
MAKE SURE THE FOUNDATION IS SOLID
Before they can arrive at this self-service paradise, however, legal management professionals will need to prioritize data quality and architecture to ensure their AI-powered self-service solutions have access to accurate, up-to-date and reliable information.
Put another way, AI-powered self-service doesn’t work very well if the organization doesn’t first pay attention to their underlying information architecture (IA).
Picture our lawyers above asking a tech support chatbot a question about how to use their new practice management system and getting a wildly inaccurate answer. Likewise, imagine the associate seeking assurance that the contract they’re putting together ticks all the right compliance boxes and getting a thumbs up from the generative AI — despite the fact that the contract is missing some crucial clauses or language.
To avoid these scenarios, organizations need to shore up their IA to get the most out of AI.