Tough Topics: Challenging Office Conversations
 

10 Managerial Roles to Boost Professional Motivation

Employing these tactics can lead to more engaged employees and less frustration.
By Sergei N. Freiman
April 2025
 

It's really no secret that self-motivated professionals tend to exhibit more job satisfaction, are typically more productive and stay longer with the firm; hence, they contribute more to both bottom and top lines. What may still be obscure to many, however, is whether management has any real impact on direct reports' professional motivation. You may find this shocking, but I constantly meet new managers who strongly believe in and act out the proposition, “It isn't my job to motivate subordinates.”

While this statement is somewhat true — indeed, managers cannot ignite an engine of perpetual self-motivation in their subordinates — still, this is not an excuse to conveniently let oneself off the hook. One thing managers can (and should) be held accountable for is professionals' frustrations. In this article, we will review which managerial roles left unattended lead to frustrated motivations.

10 MANAGERIAL ROLES

Back in the day, Henry Mintzberg had studied and identified 10 managerial roles categorized into three groups: Interpersonal, Informational and Decisional roles. The first group consists of Leader, Liaison and Figurehead roles. The second group: Monitor, Disseminator and Spokesman. And the third group hosts four remaining managerial roles: Entrepreneur, Disturbance Handler, Resource Allocator and Negotiator. To learn in detail about managerial activities pertinent to each role, I encourage you to look up Mintzberg’s original 1989 publication.

These roles aren't accidental, traditional or arbitrary. To my understanding, the 10 roles have manifested themselves naturally, out of necessity. Mintzberg's observed, empirically determined and classified roles aren’t a collection of idiosyncratic managerial behaviors. The roles are simply labels that represent systems of managerial activities. In other words, most managers tend to act this way. 

Albeit differently, each manager distributes their scarce time and effort across the aforementioned roles and ensuing activities. The question is “why?” My analysis suggests that managers have — perhaps intuitively — figured out which activities deliver the desired results best and started employing these activities matter-of-factly. What's more important, they've deciphered which activities work sustainably across time. Thus, they prefer their continual practice and, as a result, certain activities show up in research data.

The purpose of each managerial role is to facilitate the attainment of typical managerial objectives. Insofar as professionals are part of the manager's team, working together toward those objectives, managerial activities arise to address the needs and wants of the group in relationship to those common objective(s).

PROFESSIONAL MOTIVATIONS

In a work setting, every professional has four fundamental motivations: Control, Belonging, Mastery and Exploratory Curiosity. In addition, the senses of Purpose and Meaning are sought after. The table below provides mapping of 10 managerial roles to six motivations: Purpose, Control, Belonging, Mastery, Exploratory Curiosity and Meaning.

Table 1. Motivations, needs and 10 managerial roles

The proverbial professional self-motivation is more likely to occur when these motivations and needs are either met, or at least not frustrated. Therefore, it is the manager's responsibility to ensure (at minimum) anti-frustration through appropriate managerial activities. So, instead of contemplating throwing another pizza party with extra cheddar cheese toppings this time, it's much more prudent to cover the basics first.

Managers often think, “Since I myself am completely capable of doing my work without a single pizza slice or lengthy pep talks — and mind you I'm just an average Jane/Joe — my direct reports should have no trouble with motivating themselves too.” And if you're the kind of manager who is very conscientious, you'd think motivation is for little babies. Duty, you'd say, is the only thing that drives results. However, what motivates you may not motivate your colleagues.

Oftentimes, managers are missing a crucial point. Their direct reports don't set or aren't allowed to set their own job-related goals. Professionals have to adjust their behaviors in accordance with objectives set by someone else. As a consequence, the key frustrations and ensuing conflicts rest with externally imposed content, collaboration and autonomy requirements. With the exception of most senior professionals who often act as managers themselves, employees typically have limited choices about which project to work on, who to work with, and how to structure their work. Managers set these conditions, requirements and standards for them — often as non-negotiables. The 10 managerial roles serve as an antidote administered to mitigate the inevitable frustrations.

CONCLUSIONS

While it may not be required for managers to get engaged in all 10 roles at once, failure to attend to direct reports' needs via such activities is likely to result in frustrated motivations. Consequently, the likelihood of lower productivity and job dissatisfaction increases, leading to a higher probability of increased voluntary turnover as well as mediocre financial performance.

Ideally, management's ultimate goal is to create a work environment conducive to professional self-motivation. Given that it is you — the manager — who sets goals and objectives, to assume that professionals will magically become self-motivated out of their own volition, and despite your managerial interventions or lack thereof, would be presumptuous indeed.

Also in This Issue

Back to Top